GUIDE

WHAT IF THE ACCIDENT WAS
PARTLY MY FAULT?

Being partly responsible doesn't end your claim in California. It reduces it โ€” and how much it reduces it is one of the most heavily contested issues in any injury case.

THE SHORT VERSION

  • California uses pure comparative fault: you can recover even if you were mostly at fault.
  • Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of responsibility.
  • Fault percentages are argued, not calculated โ€” adjusters routinely overstate yours.
  • Don't concede fault to an insurer. It's not your determination to make.

The rule

California is a pure comparative negligence state. If you're found 30% responsible for an accident, you recover 70% of your damages. If you're found 80% responsible, you still recover 20%.

This is more generous than most states. Many use modified comparative negligence, which bars recovery entirely once a plaintiff crosses 50% or 51%. California has no such cutoff. Being mostly at fault reduces your case substantially, but it doesn't eliminate it.

How fault gets assigned

There's no formula. Fault percentages come from argument and evidence: the police report, witness accounts, physical evidence, traffic law violations, vehicle damage patterns, and sometimes accident reconstruction.

Adjusters assign an initial percentage early, and it is almost always higher than the evidence supports. That number then drives every offer that follows. Pushing back on it early, with evidence, is one of the more valuable things a lawyer does in a disputed case.

Where it comes up

Intersection collisions where both drivers claim a green light.

Lane change and merge crashes where positioning is disputed.

Pedestrian cases where the pedestrian crossed outside a marked crosswalk. Note that this does not eliminate a claim โ€” drivers still owe a duty of care, and a pedestrian's share may be modest.

Slip and fall cases, where property owners argue the hazard was open and obvious or that the person was distracted.

Motorcycle cases, where insurers frequently assign fault to the rider by default, particularly around lane splitting. Lane splitting is legal in California, and the fact that a rider was doing it is not itself negligence.

Seatbelt use. Failure to wear one doesn't establish fault for the crash, but it can reduce damages where it contributed to the severity of injuries.

What not to do

Don't concede fault to an adjuster. Apologizing at the scene, speculating about what you might have done differently, or accepting a percentage in conversation all get used later.

Fault allocation is a legal determination made on evidence. It is not something to negotiate away on a phone call three days after a crash.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Yes. California has no cutoff. At 80% at fault you recover 20% of your damages.

WHAT WE GO AFTER

  • California uses pure comparative fault: you can recover even if you were mostly at fault.
  • Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of responsibility.
  • Fault percentages are argued, not calculated โ€” adjusters routinely overstate yours.
  • Don't concede fault to an insurer. It's not your determination to make.
GET MY FREE CASE CHECK โ†’

No fee unless we recover ยท 24/7 buddy line (844) 84-BUDDY

Reviewed by Lior Katz, California State Bar No. 284559